The Following Content Has Been Provided by:Bob Unruh
Members of the federal judiciary, in a number of instances since President Donald Trump took office for his second term, have adopted political positions in their rulings.
Judges at the federal court system’s entry level, district courts, have claimed the authority to order the nation’s international affairs, financial affairs, DEI ideologies, expenditures, and more, many of which fall directly inside the president’s responsibilities under the Constitution.
And now they are complaining the Supreme Court “doesn’t have our backs.”
Anonymously, of course, as one judge, James Boasberg, in Washington, who publicly complained about Trump at a judicial conference now is the subject of an ethics complaint.
It seems judges are supposed to be neutral about issues and individuals in cases before their court, and Boasberg tried to “undermine” the president, who is involved in several cases Boasberg is hearing.
A report at Fox News explained, “A group of anonymous federal judges is criticizing the Supreme Court for overturning lower court rulings and siding with President Donald Trump’s administration with little to no explanation.”
The report cited NBC interviews with “12 federal judges, appointed by Democratic and Republican presidents including Trump.”
They complained to NBC about “a trend of lower court decisions being overturned by emergency rulings from the high court.”
Trump administration officials also have been publicly critical of the decisions made by judges who have gone out of their lane, the report said.
Ten of the judges told the Supreme Court the justices should provide more explanation when the district court decisions are reversed.
“They don’t have our backs,” said one anonymous complainer.
One judge also reported getting death threats for his rulings in opposition to the president’s agenda.
And the administration has been critical of those lower court decisions, describing one fight as the result of a “judicial coup.”
NBC said one judge who described the Supreme Court’s actions as inexcusable claimed, “Somebody is going to die” because of administration criticism.
“It’s almost like the Supreme Court is saying it is a ‘judicial coup,’” one judge told NBC.
There was one dissenter, a judge appointed by Barack Obama, who admitted multiple judges have been “out of line” with their political agendas in opposition to the president.
“The whole ‘Trump derangement syndrome’ is a real issue. As a result, judges are mad at what Trump is doing or the manner he is going about things; they are sometimes forgetting to stay in their lane,” that judge said.
One example of the judicial activism at the entry-court level is Boasberg himself.
WND reported recently when Boasberg, who has been virulently anti-Trump for years, ever since he was involved in the scheme to spy on the Trump campaign as part of the Russiagate conspiracy theory from 2016, heard a case of a woman jailed for her deranged social media posts about wanting to kill Trump.
Boasberg decided she shouldn’t be in jail, so he ordered her released, with electronic monitoring and a visit to a psychiatrist.
Lately, Boasberg has run an agenda opposing Trump’s efforts to secure America’s borders and remove illegal alien criminals from U.S. shores, wildly insisting that two jets loaded with those individuals that already were on deportation flights in international airspace to turn around and return the criminals to America, without acknowledging whether the jets even had enough fuel to do that.
The Gateway Pundit explained, “Now this woman has been quietly released by Obama-appointed Judge James Boasberg. That would be the same Judge Boasberg who has repeatedly interfered in efforts to deport illegal alien criminals.”
Boasberg also has been criticized for publicly suggesting, during a judicial conference, that Trump would not follow his orders and that would create a constitutional crisis.
Attorney General Pam Bondi explained she ordered a complaint filed over the “misconduct” by Boasberg, for “making improper public comments about President Trump and his administration.”
“These comments have undermined the integrity of the judiciary,” she confirmed.
Today at my direction, @TheJusticeDept filed a misconduct complaint against U.S. District Court Chief Judge James Boasberg for making improper public comments about President Trump and his Administration.
These comments have undermined the integrity of the judiciary, and we will…
— Attorney General Pamela Bondi (@AGPamBondi) July 28, 2025
A DOJ official confirmed, “Judge Boasberg first tried to persuade Chief Justice Roberts and other federal judges that the Trump administration would not follow court orders, despite having no basis for his belief. Then he acted on his baseless belief again and again in litigation over which he was presiding. Judge Boasberg violated the Canons of the Code of Conduct for United States Judges, including the requirement that he ‘promote public confidence in the integrity and impartiality of the judiciary.’”
Judge Boasberg first tried to persuade Chief Justice Roberts and other federal judges that the Trump Administration would not follow court orders, despite having no basis for his belief. Then he acted on his baseless belief again and again in litigation over which he was… https://t.co/PsTAGSwnIp
— Chad Mizelle (@ChadMizelle47) July 28, 2025
WorldNetDaily has reported it was the Federalist that obtained access to comments Boasberg made at a recent judicial conference undermining the president.
He disparaged the president, even though he’s required to be neutral on issues and people in his court, where Trump is a defendant in a number of cases brought by activists trying to undermine his agenda for America.
Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche later described Boasberg as a “threat to the rule of law” for using his own agendas in his court rulings to try to control the decisions of the Executive Branch.
Anti-Trump judge described by DOJ official as ‘threat to the rule of law’
